Most physicists do not have Considerably of the philosophical streak and they do not have a tendency to request whatever they examine all usually means. Philosophizing does not pay back their property finance loan. Physics operates, so they just go While using the stream; They only shut up and compute. Most philosophers Then again Really don't generally possess the technological schooling and track record to wax lyrical and come to phrases with modern-day physics. No matter if physicists or philosophers, they do not are likely to advertise them selves far too significantly out of their institution's conventional product box. It isn't really typically deemed a sensible vocation shift, particularly if you are around the tutorial street upwards and tenure. As for myself, I have no academic job to break or wipe out, so I'll Incorporate physics and philosophy and Feel way, way, way outside of the common model box. It is going to be quantum (particle) physics 'defined' by attract the Simulated (Digital actuality) Universe situation. If I am appropriate, the Nobel Prize committee appreciates where by to uncover me!

There are many anomalies with the macro-entire world that could be 'described' by resorting to a Simulated [Virtual Actuality] Universe scenario, from statues that stroll (Easter Island) into the principles of the afterlife to These feelings of déjà vu to recollections of past life to crop 'circles' to ghosts, etc and so on. On the other hand, Many of these anomalies could be classified as belonging for the paranormal or to be a pseudoscience and dismissed. Not so easily dismissed are anomalies from hardcore particle (quantum) physics, essentially the most experimentally confirmed science just about every recognised and liable in gismos and devices for over a person-3rd of the whole world's economic system. Regardless of many of the runs on the board, factors of view on the subject of Quantum Mechanics tend to be together the lines of...

Albert Einstein: God does not toss dice.

Niels Bohr: Anybody who isn't shocked through the [quantum] idea hasn't understood it.

Richard Feynman: No one understands quantum physics.

And that is feedback by noted quantum physicists.

However, The real key to reality* generally, such as yours specifically, lies in the fundamentals (i.e. - the Standard Product of Particle [Quantum] Physics) And the way it builds from the bottom up. That fact involves Individuals anomalies And just how they can be described. It is time to think the unthinkable!

# CAUSALITY

You have a tendency to affiliate insufficient causality, over the macro scale, with no cost will. What you decide to obtain for dinner tonight has no prior result in, just your spur-of-the-minute whim. It is all totally free will and free will alone, pure and straightforward.

Nonetheless, on the micro scale of fields and forces and particles, you often come across In addition they do whatever they damn properly please - no causality need utilize. A perfect instance is radioactivity. There isn't any apparent result in why 1 unstable nucleus goes poof and The same clone dwelling upcoming door doesn't. Actually if one thing like radioactivity takes place for no obvious cause in any way, nonetheless that occurring follows just one precise mathematical relationship (a person out of diverse theoretical prospects) then that undoubtedly implies some type of smart manipulation driving the scenes. The Virtual Truth creating is over the wall for all to see.

Possibly You need to take which the fields, forces and particles that collectively make up the Standard Design of Particle (nee Quantum) Physics have totally free will and therefore are someway 'alive' and 'animated' in certain perception (although their free of charge will includes some limitations similar to your cost-free will comes with limits - You can not flap your arms and fly or keep your breath underwater for 3 straight hours), OR else it truly is all programming software program which means an intelligence (a Supreme Programmer**) somewhere on up the road.

# MISSING IN ACTION

An electron might have this quantity of Strength similar to this 'orbit' (around an atomic nucleus) or that Electrical power level equivalent to a distinct 'orbit' or this other Strength stage akin to a third feasible 'orbit', and so on. but not any Power amount (and therefore 'orbit') in-among (given that Vitality comes in single indivisible quantum packets). Energy As a result is actually a discontinuous phenomenon; identical to you might have cash in multiples of 5 cents (I am speaking Australia in this article) like 5 cents, ten cents, fifteen cents, and so on. You can't Have got a coinage value of 7 cents or of 9-point-three cents.

Here's the rub. When an electron gains or loses Strength, it rises or drops It is really 'orbit'. But in which the hell could it be when it is actually rising, or slipping between allowable 'orbits'? Is it in The Twilight Zone or in An additional dimension or in Wonderland retaining Alice organization? Getting in-amongst allowable 'orbits' equates to using a forbidden Strength degree that will correspond to that in-among point out. It might be like having a six, then 7, then eight, and then a 9 cent coin when you greater the value within your pocket alter from 5 cents to ten cents.

A similar problem could be experienced with the anomaly known as quantum tunneling. A particle is right here on just one aspect of a barrier, then it's there on another side from the barrier - instantaneously - in no way to become present in-involving.

Needless to say virtual truth program could easily have our electron vanish and reappear since it quantum jumped from 1 allowable 'orbit' to a different allowable 'orbit' or as it tunneled in excess of, around or in the barrier.

# ALL Factors [NOT] Clear

The common macro analogy to an atom (nucleus and electron cloud bordering it) is trying to image a gnat (the nucleus) in the middle of Westminster Abbey using a cloud of microbes (the electrons) throughout the partitions, ceiling and floor and therefore bordering the gnat. To put it differently, there is a hell of a lot of empty Area inside your day-to-day atom. That might propose that electromagnetic radiation, photons, might have no trouble in passing appropriate on as a result of an atom with out intersecting everything and so becoming hindered on its uninterrupted journey.

So why isn't every little thing transparent? Why will not light go proper through you? Why are some matters clear (air, glass) and several points (of equivalent density and thickness) opaque for a certain wavelength/frequency of 'gentle' (mild listed here currently being not just visible light but infrared light and radio light and microwave light, and so forth. not the Electricity value of the photons of 'light' must make any difference as it is touring as a result of what is actually for all practical reasons 'empty' Area). More, photons don't have any electric cost Homes that might hinder their passing straight via your average atom.

A fast anomalous position - mild passes through air. You are able to seem obvious via roughly 100 miles of atmosphere and find out the Sunshine and moon and stars, etc. Include a little bit of smog or fog and points get a tad around the opaque side, however the overall thickness and density in the clear air, or air-smog blend, is not considerably distinct. It is nevertheless ninety nine.ninety nine% vacant space. A thing's screwy someplace unless not surprisingly there's additional programming that counters the state of affairs.

# THE PARTICLE THAT WAVES

Regular wave-particle duality is In accordance with one particular interpretation a complementary but both/or phenomenon. From time to time gentle/particle experiments exhibit effects that establish a pure 100% wave phenomena is responsible; often however other light/particle experiments exhibit outcomes that establish a pure 100% particles phenomena is the one possible interpretation. That does not make quite a lot of feeling Except You will find there's larger power (a Supreme Programmer) pulling the strings - or programming the program.

# DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENTS

The late Nobel Prize profitable quantum physicist, Richard Feynman, thought the Double Slit Experiment (and versions to the topic) was the heart and soul guiding the anomaly that is certainly Quantum Physics. It was the ultimate anomaly in a very sea of anomalies that can not, in almost any form, fashion or type, be stated by any sort of, or resort to, classical physics offered in the observable Universe.

one - If photons, electrons, Buckminsterfullerene molecules (Bucky-balls), etcetera. are fired in fast succession at an individual slit, that has a detector (like say photographic film or perhaps a Television set display screen) driving the slit, then a quasi-blob of impacts are detected. Particles rule, okay!

two - If photons, electrons, Bucky-balls, and so forth. are fired in fast succession in a double slit, using a detector behind the twin slits, then a basic wave interference (constructive and destructive interference) sample emerges. Waves rule, alright!

3 - If photons, electrons, Bucky-balls, etc. are fired one at a time, at a single slit, such that a person photon, etcetera. completes the journey before the next a person is fired off, yet again using a detector guiding the slit, then a quasi-blob of impacts are in the end detected. Particles rule, all right!

4 - If photons, electrons, Bucky-balls, and many others. are fired separately at a double slit, these types of that just one photon, and so on. completes the journey prior to the next 1 is fired off, yet again with a detector powering the slits, then eventually after sufficient firings, a vintage wave interference (constructive and destructive) pattern emerges. Waves! On the other hand, that indicates a person photon, electron, Bucky-ball, and so forth. by some means manages to undergo equally slits simultaneously and thus interferes with by itself. That is absurd. However, you ain't observed nearly anything nonetheless!

4A - The above assumes no one (human observer or impartial measuring machine) is peeking and getting the slightest detect of what is going on on - the non-observing nobodies are only looking at the sample around the detector display following the actuality; once the experiment has concluded.

4B - Nevertheless, if an individual, human observer or impartial measuring product, is peeking and getting absolute and total see of what's going on, and identifying in the specific time of passage which of the two slits the lone photon, and so forth. is actually undergoing (around the grounds that one entity simply cannot pass through two doors simultaneously) then the wave interference sample will not eventuate and you get a quasi-blob of particle hits within the detector at the rear of each of the two slits. In some way the photon, and so forth. is somehow 'aware' that it's currently being observed and variations It truly is self-interfering actions accordingly - keeping in mind the very act of observing ahead of-the-reality unobserved Attributes of the photon, and so forth. alters People Homes immediately after-the-simple fact, since you are not able to notice anything without mucking all over with it.

4C - Let's say somebody, human observer or unbiased measuring machine, peeks, but only once the photon, and so forth. has already passed by way of presumably, but absurdly, each slits and self-interfered with by itself? That shouldn't have an affect on the final word wave final result since it's now also minor to late to the photon, and so forth. to change its mind. Or so you would think. But again, irregardless, the wave interference sample disappears even once the peeking is completed after the photon, etcetera. has passed by means of each slits and self-interfered. The 1 very unpleasant and anomalous implication is that the photon, etcetera. has traveled back in time to just before, or when it absolutely was, in the beginning emitted so as to now make the 'right' option and thus will go through a person and only one slit to correlate what it essentially does with what is really detected.

5 - Summary: If you switch your again and don't peek, and there's a double slit out there, the detector screen, and as a consequence you, will detect a wave sample as the photon, and many others. will pass through equally slits and self-interfere.

If you don't change your back again away from the action, but do a peeping-Tom act, double slit notwithstanding, the detector screen and thus you may detect a particle (quasi-blob) sample guiding Each individual slit.

The 2 extremely disturbing facets are that a photon, etcetera. displays consciousness, and free of charge will, in addition to exhibiting a chance to journey backwards in time. Photons, and so on. not only know just before-the-simple fact whether or not both of those slits are open (two open slits equals wave actions); or that just one or the opposite slit is open up (either/or equals particle conduct), but also whether somebody is peeking. If both of those holes (slits) are open up and nobody is peeking we find yourself owning wave interference behavior; if a person is peeking even though each holes (slits) are open up, we get particle quasi-blob behavior. That means the photons, and so forth. know (how is that probable?) and change and work out their cost-free will (how is always that doable?) accordingly.

six - Conclusion: Now either You have to think we exist from the Twilight Zone #One particular where denizens of the micro world have an awareness in their surroundings and have some degree of free of charge will to react to and within just People environment, OR you think we are in The Twilight Zone #Two in which stated denizens of the micro environment are programmed by bigger authority** to behave in how we see and evaluate them behave.

# SYMMETRY & PARITY

One of the elemental bedrocks beloved by physicists is their really like of symmetry, Particularly with regard to time, cost and parity.

Physics really should work as we understand it no matter whether time is considered optimistic or adverse***. It won't make any difference should you go fifty miles for every negative hour for 10 adverse several hours, you continue to travel five hundred miles. Or, envision two electrons (phone them A and B) touring toward in time, Every approaching the other. After they get near ample, they can repel one another (both becoming of precisely the same detrimental cost) by exchanging a virtual photon. But which electron emitted the virtual photon? It might need been A to B forward in time, but it is equally as probable that it might have been B to the backwards in time. It's symmetrical In any case you care to have a look at it. And naturally any damaging time which is squared in almost any equation reverts to good time.

Physics and chemistry really should work quantum ai australia as we realize it whether or not positrons (antimatter electrons) 'orbited' all over nuclei comprised of antiprotons and antineutrons (collectively anti-nucleons). So demand is symmetric.

Parity is your still left-suitable mirror impression. Physics should really remain exactly the same when viewed within a mirror. Mirror gentle still arrives outside of a mirror image flashlight; gravity however tends to make mirror impression apples tumble for the mirror graphic floor. The distinction among left and ideal need to hold no sway in physics. However, whilst cost and time are completely symmetrical with regard on the functions in physics, there is certainly an 'oops' in parity. The 'oops' isn't in electromagnetism, nor in gravity, nor from the powerful nuclear power (which maintain the nucleons (protons and neutrons) in a tight embrace while in the nucleus. Parity however is just not conserved in weak nuclear drive interactions. Physicists may well declare that Mother Nature contains a slight bias in the direction of the remaining; some theologians may advise that God is really a weak lefthander; I would place it that our Supreme Programmer released into some computer software subroutines a code favoring a slight still left-handed slant